 |
There is a project to improve articles about England – see the England Expedition page. |
|
|
|
Formatting and language conventions
For articles about England, please use the 12-hour clock to show times, e.g. 9AM-noon and 6PM-midnight. Please show prices in this format: £100, and not 100 pounds, UKP100, or 100 GBP. Please use British spelling. |
Rollback
[edit]I just rolled back the most recent edits by User:82.3.96.145, because the content was copied from Wikitravel (legal but strongly discouraged for obvious reasons) and copyrighted websites (illegal). ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Encapsulating "See"
[edit]Lots of content was added to the "See" section. It feels to me like it's way too long now. Would it be best to keep all the paragraphs in the beginning of the section but greatly reduce their lengths, or should some of those that were added be removed? And maybe even more importantly, I can't support subsections on numerous museums, festivals and castles: we need an overview, not an overly long article that few will want to read through. If the star-rated article on Bali can summarize its sights in a compact "See" section, I can't think of any reason why the equivalent section in the England article has to go on and on. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. Let's focus on travel information and not load up too much on background information. Ground Zero (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, guys! I concur, I will reduce the text I included yesterday. I apologize for this; I am currently elevating the scope and making comparisons with other pages, and you are absolutely correct. I will ensure that all my text is condensed & won't make new changes going forward. The only changes I'll make is trimming all the text I added. All the best. 2A0A:EF40:E1C:EB01:2D59:52E7:BC27:C3B7 20:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- About these edits: What if anything should we keep? Is there anything in the "Internet" subsection that doesn't apply to other countries of the UK? I would suppose that at least the sections on phoning and post could be reverted entirely. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, guys! I concur, I will reduce the text I included yesterday. I apologize for this; I am currently elevating the scope and making comparisons with other pages, and you are absolutely correct. I will ensure that all my text is condensed & won't make new changes going forward. The only changes I'll make is trimming all the text I added. All the best. 2A0A:EF40:E1C:EB01:2D59:52E7:BC27:C3B7 20:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)