Hi, I have finished my comparison between Yueyang and Paris. Please review my article and let me know if there’s anything I should improve.

This comparison reviews my Yueyang sandbox article against the Wikivoyage "Star" article for Paris. The goal is to evaluate structure, tone, level of detail, and technical compliance with Wikivoyage standards as part of the Final Touches assignment.

• **Paris (Star article)**: Complete and standardized structure (Understand; Get in; Get around; See; Do; Eat; Drink; Sleep; Stay safe; Go next), with clear subsections, listings and many ready-to-use templates and maps.
• **Yueyang (Sandbox)**: Now follows the same overall skeleton. I added missing subsections (Climate; Orientation; History) and reorganized headings to match Wikivoyage conventions.

• **Paris**: Traveler-focused, natural English, uses second-person/imperative where helpful, avoids academic tone.
• **Yueyang**: Rewritten to adopt a travel-guide tone. I used AI only for structure and proofreading, then reworked wording manually to ensure original, traveler-oriented phrasing.

• **Paris**: Includes many concrete details (opening hours, transport times, prices, coordinates), and plentiful listings with contacts or URLs.
• **Yueyang**: Added train/airport information, climate summary, and key attractions. Still needs more specific prices, example accommodations (with concrete names/addresses), and a few more verified listings with working URLs.

• **Paris**: Rich cultural descriptions and neighborhood guides giving a clear sense of atmosphere.
• **Yueyang**: Improved historical context (Yueyang Tower, Dongting Lake, Confucian Temple) and added a concise History section to give readers cultural background without becoming encyclopedic.

• **Paris**: Uses many templates, interactive maps, and banner/images that enhance usability.
• **Yueyang**: I added basic templates and a climate table compatible with Wikivoyage syntax, and ensured internal links work. Next steps: add an appropriate Commons banner image and more listings using the . / .  style.

• **Strengths now**: Correct skeleton structure, improved travel tone, added Climate/Orientation/History, and repaired prior formatting errors.
• **Next steps**:

 * Add 5–10 verified listings with GPS coordinates and official URLs.
 * Add 2–3 concrete accommodation examples and sample price ranges.

* Upload or suggest a banner image on Wikimedia Commons and add it via

when available.

 * Request community feedback (posted to Travellers' Pub) and revise per suggestions.

• I initially made several edits on the Chinese site by mistake; those edits were reverted. To make up for that, I completed 20 valid edits this week on the English Wikivoyage sandbox and related pages.
• I used AI tools to help check structure and grammar, but the final wording, sources, and wiki code adjustments were done manually to ensure compliance with Wikivoyage standards.

Please review the sandbox article and this comparison. I welcome suggestions on adding reliable listings, suitable banner images, or any style/formatting adjustments needed for the article to reach "Usable" or higher status. Ziyi Deng (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)