- I would agree, if this article isn't merged with Taos, but why is Taos#Taos Pueblo inadequate, and if it is, why can't the information in this article simply be merged into that section? Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I feel that Taos Pueblo is unique enough to have its own page, and that it would take up too much space on the Taos page. That is why I created this page, also it allows for travelers to gain more information on this place than they would if it was a part of the Taos page. Donaudamphschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2017 (PST)
- So far, I'm not convinced this would take up too much space on the Taos page, partly because I think the rules can be summarized, with a link (and if we keep this article separate, I think that should be done in a "Respect" section, but if this were merged with the Taos article, it could be summarized at Taos#Respect). Maybe if there could be some listings in "Buy" and "Eat", it would take up too much space to fit in a single section of the Taos article. But if we keep this article, shouldn't the capitalization be "Taos Pueblo"? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- I've made the change, but if you disagree, this is still up for discussion. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- So far, I'm not convinced this would take up too much space on the Taos page, partly because I think the rules can be summarized, with a link (and if we keep this article separate, I think that should be done in a "Respect" section, but if this were merged with the Taos article, it could be summarized at Taos#Respect). Maybe if there could be some listings in "Buy" and "Eat", it would take up too much space to fit in a single section of the Taos article. But if we keep this article, shouldn't the capitalization be "Taos Pueblo"? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)