Logo Voyage

Wikivoyage:Requests for checkuser Voyage Tips and guide

You can check the original Wikivoyage article Here

This page exists for allowing users to request for checkuser information on the English Wikivoyage.

Before requesting a check, please make sure to do the following:

  • Read Wikivoyage's checkuser policy
  • List your request at the bottom of Requests
  • State why:
    • a check is needed;
    • how those accounts are possibly related.

To file a request, use {{checkuser}} individually to list users. An example request would be as follows:

===Foo===
* {{checkuser|Foo}}
* {{checkuser|Bar}}
Foo, an indefinitely blocked user, previously extensively edited [[Canberra]] articles before being community banned. Bar is a newly recreated account that also similarly extensively edits [[Canberra]] articles and thus may potentially be block evading. //~~~~

Please use the checkuser template, as this adds a permalink to the request in the (non-public) checkuser log.

As per this site's checkuser policy, stewards may also handle requests placed on this page.

Requests

[edit]

FrederikTopper

[edit]

Three of these accounts are blocked, as suspected sockpuppet accounts of Brendan, a well-known Long-term abuser. See these edits from Suburbs, Queensland, and Riyadh. Please do not forget to see the edit filter and tags too. Requesting an IP check for sure. //--~2026-69216-3 (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Procedurally marking this as not done since IPs cannot be publicly connected to accounts. //shb (t | c | m) 04:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

HenrikKitzel

[edit]

I assume HenrikKitzel (talk contribs deleted contribs logs block user block log CA AllContribs checkuser investigate) is yet another sock of Brendan, but please check. Difference here. Also, ping to @User:Pashley, who took them seriously and sent them a greeting as if they were a new good-faith user: I think you should note the outcome of this checkuser. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't the ping working? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Done – although no sleeper accounts found, account is likely a match (both technically and behaviorally). Blocked and reverted accordingly. //shb (t | c | m) 04:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(btw @Ikan Kekek:, one small thing: could you use {{checkuser}} to link user accounts needing checking – only ask this because the template exists to provide a permalink to the request when submitting a reason for checking on the checkuser interface. //shb (t | c | m) 09:08, 4 April 2026 (UTC))[reply]

Heathhenry66

[edit]

Three accounts, are blocked as Spambots / spam-only accounts. I assume that there are more spam accounts to see on the block list. One of them, are globally locked, with the reason of Spam-only account. Please check for sleepers, if these are lurking around. //--~2026-69216-3 (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Having looked at the deleted contributions, the spam in question seems unrelated to each other, thus making a checkuser as merely a fishing exercise (which isn't permitted). However, I've globally locked the other two accounts in question as spambots. //shb (t | c | m) 06:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! ~2026-69216-3 (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]


Discover



Powered by GetYourGuide