|
Archives
|
Inactive bureaucrats 2024/10
[edit]
The good-to-go list:
- Ikan Kekek (talk · contribs) (last edit on 2024-10-05; last admin or bureaucrat action on 2024-10-02)
- SHB2000 (talk · contribs) (last edit on 2024-10-05; last admin or bureaucrat action on 2024-10-05)
- ThunderingTyphoons! (talk · contribs) (last edit on 2024-09-27; last admin or bureaucrat action on 2024-10-06) (updated)
Only user who meets the inactivity criteria is:
- LtPowers (talk · contribs) (last edit on 2024-09-03; did not make admin or bureaucrat actions within the last year)
Based on this, I'll send out a notice to both LtPowers and ThunderingTyphoons! – with Powers' deadline being 14 days from now (2024-10-19) and ThunderingTyphoons!'s deadline being 14 days from their last admin action (2024-11-06). I thank both of you for their service and wish them all the best for your futures.
--SHB2000 (t | c | m) 08:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- LtPowers has now had their bureaucrat perms removed; thanks to him for his service. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 22:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
"Bureaucrat status is granted per language version. Sometimes, a language version will only have one bureaucrat, who must be an administrator in good standing. Stewards can handle requests for languages that do not have a bureaucrat."
[edit]I don't think this sentence is relevant for us anymore since SUL and most new bureaucrats on small wikis have to meet m:MVR. Any objections to removing this? //shb (t | c | m) 10:50, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- What's SUL? But I agree that it's not relevant, because there are bureaucrats on this site. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2025 (UTC)