Merger
[edit]
- cc Ground Zero since you also suggested this at Special:Diff/4855986. //shb (t | c | m) 10:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ground Zero (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose it's just a suggestion without any reason supporting it. Doostdar (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- SHB's comment explains it: there is very little useful content. It would be more useful if merged to the city article. Ground Zero (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- You can add to the content. Little content is not a good reason to delete. Doostdar (talk) 18:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you added content, you could thereby make a strong argument for keeping a separate article for this airport. Waiting for others who support merging and redirecting the article or don't have any strong interest in its continued separate existence to do so is not likely to be a fruitful strategy. I say all of that while falling into the category of someone who doesn't care much about whether this article is merged into the Tehran article or not and certainly won't add content to it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Doodstar, #1 I don't work for you. #2 Wikivoyage:Airport Expedition lists as a criterion for an airport getting its own article, "Does the airport have enough food and shopping options to fill out an entire "Buy" and "Eat and Drink" section?" According to the article, the answer to this question is "no". Ground Zero (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- You can add to the content. Little content is not a good reason to delete. Doostdar (talk) 18:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- SHB's comment explains it: there is very little useful content. It would be more useful if merged to the city article. Ground Zero (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)