Talk:Maria Island National Park Voyage Tips and guide

Contents

I don't have a strong opionon on this and I haven't been to Maria Island. The new banner is a good view which wasn't available when I made the existing one, but the existing banner may give a better general feel for the island. AlasdairW (talk) 23:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I had thought that too. The current banner seems a bit more dull, but with more focus on the UNESCO WHS bit, while the current one seems more vivid and bright but with less focus on the UNESCO WHS. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'd sacrifice general view and go with 1 because look better. But what concerns me a little is if the page title in pagebanner overlaps the house in 1. --Onwa (talk) 18:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I prefer the current banner. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 15:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

So this banner change is Not done. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Banner 0 is better; Banner 1 is too dark and looks tilted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@AlasdairW and Ikan Kekek I used the alternate one in the newly created Eastern Tasmania article as part of the new region structure so the new one has good use. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

As 100 percent of this park is a national park, would it make sense to categorize it as a park article as opposed to a ruralarea? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 04:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Sure. Ground Zero (talk) 12:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
• FWIW, I don't think needs community approval. Plunge forward.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done. re community approval, I usually just wait for an opinion, unless it's something like the move on Paleontology in Australia in line with the Commons category. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply