|
Votes for deletion
This page lists articles, files and templates that are nominated for deletion. Any Wikivoyager can make a nomination or comment on any nomination. Nominations or comments should follow a rationale based on our deletion policy. If our deletion policy leads towards a merge or redirect, then coordinate this on the discussion page of the article. The purpose of this page is limited to the interpretation and application of our deletion policy. You can discuss what our deletion policies should be on the deletion policy discussion page. Nominating[edit source]Add a {{vfd}} tag to the top of the article, file or template being proposed for deletion, so that people viewing it will be aware. Place the tag at the very top, before everything else, except the page banner. Do note though, if you're tagging a template for deletion, use <noinclude>{{vfd}}</noinclude> instead of {{vfd}} alone. Add a link to the article, file or template at the end of the list below, along with the reason why it is being listed for deletion. Sign your recommendation using four tildes ("~~~~"). If you're nominating a file for deletion, make sure it's actually hosted on the English Wikivoyage and not on Wikimedia Commons. The basic format for a deletion nomination is: ===[[Chicken]]=== Not a valid travel article topic. ~~~~ Commenting[edit source]All Wikivoyagers are invited to comment on articles, files or templates listed for deletion. The format for comments is: ===[[Chicken]]=== * '''Delete'''. Not a valid travel article topic. TravelNut 25:25, 31 Feb 2525 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. There is a town in [[Alaska]] called Chicken. ~~~~ When leaving comments you may elect to delete, keep, or redirect the article. If you recommend redirection, you may suggest where it should be redirected to. Any attempt to merge content from an article to some other destination must retain the edit history to comply with the attribution (CC BY-SA) requirements of the free license, so it may be possible to merge and redirect but not to merge and delete. Sign your comment using four tildes ("~~~~"). Deleting, or not[edit source]
Archiving[edit source]After you keep/redirect/merge/delete the article, file or template, move the deletion discussion to the Archives page for the appropriate month. The root archives page has a directory. Note that it's the month in which the action was taken, rather than when the nomination was first posted, that should be used for the archived discussion; that way, recourse to the deletion log can lead subsequent readers right to the discussion (at least for the pages that were deleted). When archiving, always make it clear to other editors what the outcome of the discussion was. First, describe the outcome in the edit summary when you remove the discussion, with something like "archive as kept". Then add a line for the result to the discussion on the archive page. If the nominated article, file or template was not deleted, then the nomination should be mentioned on its talk page. Generally this is done by providing a link to the deletion discussion on the talk page. One should also indicate the result on the talk page. If the discussion is short, an alternative is to place an (identical duplicate) copy of the discussion on the talk page. See also:
|
July 2026
[edit source]In 2019, this article scraped through a VFD on the (mistaken) basis that there were still a few monolingual Ainu speakers left. Sadly, this was not the case even at the time, and as of 2026 even the last bilingual native speakers have passed away. While it's still a heritage language taught in a few schools etc, the phrasebook is of no conceivable actual use to the traveller.
I would, however, be happy to rescue a few basic greetings and such for an infobox in Hokkaido, which already has some mildly-interesting basics like Ainu place names. Asamboi (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete standard phrasebooks for dead languages aren't really helpful. It could potentially be turned into a travel topic, but I think adding a few phrases to Hokkaido would be more useful. //shb (t | c | m) 01:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete as the language is recently dead with no native speakers left. It can be archived at WV:Archive. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 03:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- It is always sad to delete an article somebody has made a good-faith effort in creating and others have improved. I like the idea of archiving such articles. This is possibly also useful, such as the suggested saving of some phrases – for attribution reasons, you cannot merge content elsewhere from a to-be-deleted article, that content has to be deleted along with it. However, some articles should indeed be deleted, not archived, including those found unreliable. So let's archive this one. –LPfi (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- I too support archiving (not sure if my message earlier implied that), but I think if it is, Ainu phrasebook should redirect to Hokkaido#Talk. //shb (t | c | m) 06:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- It is always sad to delete an article somebody has made a good-faith effort in creating and others have improved. I like the idea of archiving such articles. This is possibly also useful, such as the suggested saving of some phrases – for attribution reasons, you cannot merge content elsewhere from a to-be-deleted article, that content has to be deleted along with it. However, some articles should indeed be deleted, not archived, including those found unreliable. So let's archive this one. –LPfi (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Archive (or Delete) as this is no longer practical for travel. I like the idea of rescuing interesting details in Hokkaido, Minority cultures of Japan#Ainu or any individual destinations associated with Ainu culture. Gerode (talk) 15:09, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I am undecided between "Keep" and "Archive, retaining a redirect". There are incoming links from Commons and Wikipedia. How much cultural use is there of Ainu? Is a traveller likely to see a performance or concert using Ainu, or hear greetings in Ainu? AlasdairW (talk) 20:57, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Unless they specifically seek out an Ainu cultural center, they are exceedingly unlikely to see or hear either of those. And standard phrasebook fare ("where is the train station") won't be useful if they do. Asamboi (talk) 23:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Archive. It's by no means impossible that the language could be revived in the future. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Could also refer to WV:Search engine optimization or Séguéla Airport. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: The airport should have priority, only we have no information in it. The town of 50,000 inhabitants (according to Wikipedia) redlinks. The town is listed in Northern Savanna#Cities, but only HGO IATA is mentioned in Get in. Wikipedia has no information on what flights there are to the airport. Seems the redirect is unneeded for the time being.
- We should avoid cross-namespace redirects, and I don't think business promoters find the current redirect – but I wonder, what way do they find (or are supposed to find) Wikivoyage:Welcome, business owners, Wikivoyage:Welcome, tourism professionals & al? Wikivoyage:Policies, the most relevant-looking left-margin link (in Monobook; where are they in Vector?) does not help.
- –LPfi (talk) 07:55, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- @LPfi: I have listed Séguéla Airport at Northern Savanna. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 05:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
We considered and rejected this as a travel topic during the COVID lockdown, because viewing stuff without leaving the house is by definition not travel, and therefore off topic for this site. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete Another option could be to redirect to Staycation and make an off-hand reference to it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete, with a possible exception if it is completely rewritten to describe using virtual tools to complement physical travel. This could be museums who offer virtual tours using a device on the ground floor for those who don't fancy the stairs, or using online photos etc to help in trip planning. The only purely virtual tourism we want to encourage is reading our pages, like DOTM. AlasdairW (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- If we are including exceptions, we also have Volunteer_travel#Stay-at-home_volunteering. Pashley (talk) 16:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Does anybody remember where that COVID-era discussion was? I couldn't find anything in the VfD archives. Gerode (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Bah! Found it a minute later in Talk:Staycation Gerode (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete unless we have a volunteer for a rewrite along the lines Alasdair suggests. Pashley (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Virtual tourism could maybe fit somewhere into an article about trip planning, as in videos and pictures that make you want to go to a certain place. (Or binge-watching such material a few days before you go because you wish you would be there already!!!). However, Wikivoyage and travel in general is IMO about actually going to those places, therefore I too say delete. --Ypsilon (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. //shb (t | c | m) 01:38, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. I think virtual travel in some sense could be suggested and discussed in Responsible travel and some sub-article of Preparation: about learning to know the place before actually going there, as suggested by AlasdairW – but in its current state the article has nothing salvageable for that discussion. –LPfi (talk) 10:38, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- As creator, I also lean towards deletion as long as it is described elsewhere appropriately. I just thought it's an interesting topic as it can complement physical travel. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:16, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
