Talk:Indonesian phrasebook Voyage Tips and guide

Contents

What are 10000 and 100000 called? Malagasy has names for the powers of ten up to a million (tapitrisa), and "ribu" is an obvious cognate of "arivo". -(WT-en) phma 12:42, 28 Mar 2004 (EST)

---

There are independent words for 10.000 and 100.000 which are borrowings from Sanskrit. 10.000 = koti and 100.000 = laksa. But 10.000 is just called sepuluh ribu and 100.000 seratus ribu. (WT-en) Meursault2004 16:50, 28 Mar 2004 (EST)

---

I'm not familiar with Malayan languages. I'm wondering if Indonesian and Malaysian are sufficiently different to have different phrasebooks. --(WT-en) Evan 17:47, 28 Mar 2004 (EST)

---

Well grammatically both languages are not that different, but idiomatically the difference can be great. So I think Indonesian and Malaysian should have different phrasebooks. Obviously the Malaysian phrasebook should be written by a native speaker of Malaysian Malay.

Or to save space, the Indonesian and Malaysian phrasebook could be combined into just one phrasebook. And only the differences between Indonesian and Malaysian Malay will be higlighted. For example "Police" is called "polis" in Malaysia and "polisi" in Indonesia. (WT-en) Meursault2004 19:02, 28 Mar 2004 (EST)

I was just thinking about this too... having travelled in both, I think the similarities are much greater than the differences from a traveller's point of view, so for time being I'll plunge forward and redirect Malay phrasebook here with a notice added to the beginning. (WT-en) Jpatokal 10:56, 8 Nov 2004 (EST)

Having travelled a little more in Indonesia I've changed my mind, so now they're separate again. (WT-en) Jpatokal 04:44, 6 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Indonesian is indeed noted by several for its fondness for Orwellian newspeak feature. But this feature is actually not a legacy of Soeharto's New Order society, which is somewhat reminiscent of Orwell's 1984 society. The truth is less romantic or intriguing. It is rather a peculiarity of Indonesian as an Austronesian language. Many if not all Austronesian languages, as Indonesian, show a certain fondness for bisyllabic words. And indeed, most of these acronyms are bisyllabic. (WT-en) Meursault2004 15:56, 5 Jun 2005 (EDT)

But why doesn't Malay do it then? In Malaysia it's the acronym that rules. (WT-en) Jpatokal 00:48, 6 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Well as for Malay, the acronym or rather the 'acronymisation' of loose words is another manifestation of the same phenomenon. In Javanese for example, this feature also concerns everyday's words, not just political or socio-economical concepts.

There is furthermore one important difference between Orwellian Newspeak and Indonesian. In 1984's Newspeak there is an attempt to minimise the vocabulary of the English, while in Indonesian the vocabulary has grown extensively the last 50 years or so. Another interesting fact about Orwellian Newspeak is that this may have been based on facts not just fiction. The American and I think the British tried to create a simplified version of the English language. (WT-en) Meursault2004 04:14, 6 Jun 2005 (EDT)

OK, maybe you're reading a little too much into my flippant metaphor. Feel free to change it if you can think of something better... but quite seriously, the only other language I know of that practices this so regularly is Soviet-era Russian (Komintern, Vagonmashimpexpstroy, etc.) (WT-en) Jpatokal 04:26, 6 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Well I dont know the reason why the Soviets did that. Maybe they did that to cover up the true meaning of the words? I don't know. But it is also possible that there is some Soviet influence to be discerned in Indonesian. It was actually not Soeharto but Soekarno who started this fondness for what I call 'acronymisation'. Soekarno is also noted for his leftist sympathies. He is even accused of being a communist by some. (WT-en) Meursault2004 04:31, 6 Jun 2005 (EDT)

The phrasebook uses the formal/polite Anda form, not the informal kamu/mu, so I've rolled back this change:

What is your name?

Namanya siapa? (NUM-muh-nyuh shah-puh?)

What is your name?

Siapa namamu? (shah-puh NUM-muh-moo?)

Is it worth it to list both? (WT-en) Jpatokal 01:26, 5 March 2007 (EST)

@Jpatokal: The lower one is the right one. "Namanya siapa?" means "What is the name (of something)?". Veracious (talk) 04:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I speak Malay and not really Indonesian, so it wouldn't shock me if this is correct Indonesian, but it sure sounds strange to me:

"Apakah Anda bicara bahasa Inggris?"

I would translate that as "What you speak English?" Of course that doesn't make sense. Is "Adakah Anda bicara bahasa Inggris?" the intended sentence? Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

And the form of words I was taught in Indonesian class back when was "Saudara/Saudari bisa bicara bahasa Inggris?" "Bisa" means "poison" in Malay, but of course in Indonesian, it means "can", for which word, Malays use "boleh". :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The same case can be said for the phrase "What's your name?": we said "Siapa namamu?" which actually is literally translated to, "Who your name?". For me learning this in English the first time, it's startling, yet all Indonesians are accustomed to say it that way. It is the same case as "Apakah" in asking a yes or no question. You can also ask "Anda bisa bicara bahasa Inggris?" in your case, which is supposedly similar in structure to a couple European languages , but for us that is impolite. The more correct way if we want to simplify it would be "Bisakah Anda bicara bahasa Inggris?" which is translatable quite literally to English (the suffix -kah is used when asking questions) and that's what I adopted in this phrasebook.Othello95 (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I understand that Malays and Indonesians have "false friends" words, in which case speakers of both languages must try to somehow get around it. It's the fact we cannot change, unfortunately.

Understood. I guess this is another difference between Malay and Indonesian, because I have trouble imagining "Apakah" being used in such sentences in Malay. Granted that I usually spoke village Malay of the Terengganu dialect, but I think it's generally still the case that Malay is usually less formal than Indonesian, so I believe "Anda boleh cakap Bahasa Inggeris?" would be quite polite in Malay, given the use of the polite "Anda" form of "you"; I would usually use "awak", but some native speakers were claiming that nowadays, it's considered impolite by some people. I also normally use "Apa nama awak?", or in more familiar settings "Apa namamu?", but in Terengganu dialect, all kinds of formal rules were constantly flouted in everyday speech, and when I visited the state again in 2003, people were speaking standard language and using more formal language quite a lot. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am a non-native but proficient Indonesian speaker and would definitely use 'apakah' in this way, generally, but not in the specific context where I was asking if someone speaks English. So in a formal discussion I might use 'apakah' to open a question about whether something was really the case: "Apakah memang anggaran tidak tersedia?" (Is the budget really not available?). For something less formal like asking if someone speaks English, I would ask "Apa Bapak/Ibu bisa berbahasa Inggris?", using "apa" as the question marker. You'll notice I didn't use "Anda". I am rarely in a situation where I feel happy to use it - it sounds stilted and impersonal in a country where everything is about building personal relations. I would rather ask their name first "Maaf, nama Bapak/Ibu siapa?" before continuing with that: "Apa Pak Tarjo bisa berbahasa Inggeris?. Tawonmadu (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tawonmadu is right in this case. Using "Bapak/Ibu" in a sentence, where you want to ask the person of being able to speak English is correct. Although in Jakarta for example, sometimes asking "Apa anda bisa Bahasa Inggris" is polite enough because of using the word "Anda" (except you're right for the building personal relations). But I would advise using the word Bapak/Ibu as the sense of politeness and admiration. If you know the person already inside and outside of work environment, using both slangs "lo (which means you)" and "gue (means I)" for integrating into the society would almost amaze them every time. It's of course impolite for addressing with "lo" and "gue" to the elderly and someone who is a lot older than you so using both words is only advisable for conversations amongst the same age as you are. ibhi19 (talk) 13:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

These are real differences from Malay, at least as I know the language. The simplest way to find out whether someone speaks English in Malay is to simply ask "Boleh cakap Bahasa Inggeris?" or to use the same sentence beginning with some signifier of "you" (awak, Anda, or perhaps the English word "you", which at least used to be used a lot in Malaysian cities, especially on the West Coast). Sure, you can use polite expressions like "makcik", "pakcik" and so forth, but if you're already using expressions like that, you speak Malay and aren't likely to need to know whether your interlocutor can speak English. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't think advising people to pronounce "nak" as "nack" is good. Actually, it will encourage stereotypically "orang putih" ("white people's") pronunciations. I won't hold up the solutions in the Malay phrasebook as anything close to perfect, but at least there's an attempt to deal with glottal stops there, by using the formerly used ' sign. I'd encourage editors of this phrasebook to look at the Malay phrasebook, since the two languages are so closely related. And while you're there, by all means edit anything you think you can improve (but not by making everything overly Indonesian, please :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think "WHACK-too" for waktu is even worse, as many English-speakers pronounce "wh" as a "hw" sound. "WOK-too" would be closer, but the English "k" consonant really does not resemble a glottal stop. I really disagree with teaching people "white people's pronunciation". Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

It might help if there was an agreed and robust way of representing the glottal stop in the pseudo-transliteration scheme. Tf there was a guideline it would give a basis for going in with large scale edits of existing text. I've been using a single quotation mark but that can cause problems when combined with other formatting. For "waktu" using the quotation mark glottal stop, I would transliterate as WA'-too. Tawonmadu (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'd use "wah'-too", even though there's no "h" sound. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'd personally recommend "WAK-too" as a preferred pronunciation to "Waktu" just because it sounds closer to how the natives speak and usually the 'k' sound is apparent. ibhi19 (talk) 07:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by "apparent"? It is a glottal stop, is it not? In Malay it is. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Also, keep in mind that a lot of English speakers will pronounce "wak" as "wack", not with an a as in "father". That's a no-good way to pronounce Indonesian. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Aaah, alright. I'm kind of confused of how the westerners pronounce "wak" and "whack", though, since I didn't realise it is how they mostly pronounce it. And yes, it is also a glottal stop in Indonesian as well. Sorry. ibhi19 (talk) 08:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

There are many different accents of English. For most Americans, whack=wack. Not so in some other places. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I recently stumbled onto this page and I don't really know if the "newspeak" (or slang) section worth to add, because Indonesians (especially living in Jakarta, Bandung, and other big cities) tend to use slangs to shorten the sentence while talking.

For example:

Popular abbreviations: Buryam (BOOR-yum): Bubur Ayam, or Toprak (Top-ruck): Ketoprak

Popular slangs: Lo/elu (low/uh-loo) = you, Gue/Gua (goo-way/goo-wah) = I ibhi19 (talk) 13:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I would say absolutely include much-used slang. These are words that as a Malay-speaker, I don't know. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alright then. I'm going to collect some data first and then coming back here to add more. ibhi19 (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

After many considerations, I'd just put the link to Indonesian Slangs' Wikipedia page due to their extensive list of slangs and common abbreviations, if it's possible. Putting those extended lists here is kind of unnecessary. ibhi19 (talk) 06:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The governing policy on links to Wikipedia is shown at Wikivoyage:Links to Wikipedia, but I think this one is OK. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Now I've added some common and popular abbreviations and mostly are still spoken and understood by many Indonesians, particularly in big cities. I hope that might help in the long run. ibhi19 (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I hear this word used v e r y rarely, and it usually sounds a little bit weird: forced at best, creepy at worst. I would never consider using it to an Indonesian. Is that misguided? Tawonmadu (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Do Indonesians ever use it to talk to foreigners? Also, is it ever used as a title in Indonesia, as Tuan and Puan are used in Malaysia? Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I get called it very rarely, and it sounds a bit obsequious. Never used as a title here. The only time I regularly hear it is in the construction 'tuan rumah' meaning 'host'. Tawonmadu (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

As an Indonesian, I can confirm, yes. Nowadays it is rare to use 'tuan' and 'nyonya' in everyday conversation amongst Indonesians. It is more of a symbol and also has a special use in monarchial constitution such as in Yogyakarta, where the governing body is still held by Sultanate system, led by Sultan Hamengkubuwono X (the tenth). ibhi19 (talk) 08:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

When my parents were called "Tuan" and "Puan" in the village we used to live in, early on, they pushed back hard and got people to stop. Definitely obsequious: It's more than "Sir" and "Madam", approaching "My Lord" and "Milady". If it's used so rarely in Indonesia, by all means remove it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I would not think it helpful to advise learners to use those sounds, as per the recent edit. Using the pronunciation style guide of WV, I would go for PAHNG-gang and GO-rehng. (Non-native but BA and MA Indonesian language, 35 years in Indonesia). Tawonmadu (talk) 15:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see it now. You have far more experience on the language and the life there so I agree with your suggestion on how to pronounce the words. I'm an Indonesian native and yet still couldn't figure out how to explain the pronunciation, though. ibhi19 (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Lock", throughout most of the U.S.A. and at least some of Canada, is "lahk". We need another "as in" for this vowel. I think Indonesian "o" is not usually an "aw" sound as in "saw", but closer to "oa" in "boat". It's an imperfect analogy ("o" in Indonesian has no "w" sound or "oo" sound at the end), but it's closer than "ah". Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

In the Malay phrasebook, we have o "like 'ow' in `low', but without the `w' sound". Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

We can use that as well. "O" as in "go" or as in "box" is acceptable as well. ibhi19 (talk) 07:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Box" has exactly the same problem as "lock": it's pronounced "bahks" in most of the U.S. and a lot of Canada. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You're right. We can use the same analogy as mentioned in Malay phrasebook, then. It sounds exactly as you proposed. ibhi19 (talk) 08:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tawonmadu and Ibhi19 have been doing a lot of great work on pseudo-transliterations, but I still think "orang" would be better transliterated as "OH-rahng", because the English word "rang" is pronounced with a very different vowel than "A" in "father" by most North American English speakers, among many others. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Further to the point: Keep in mind how most English-speakers pronounce "orangutan" (oh-RAEN-guh-taen would be my attempt at a psuedo-transliteration of their pronunciation). It would be better for them not to use that pronunciation while in Indonesia. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

From the article:

Just like English, Indonesia uses the Latin alphabet system and Arabic numerals.

People who speak European languages like to claim that we use Arabic numerals, but the numbers actually used in Arabic texts such as the Qur'an are not the same as the ones we use. Indonesian uses the kinds of numbers we use in English, albeit with some divergences in decimal use. But anyone expecting actual Arabic numerals will be surprised. So what should we say? Per Wikipedia, maybe we should call them "Western Arabic numerals". Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't know when or why it got put at the beginning of the "Consonants" section, but that's confusing and inappropriate. It has to be moved down the page. The question is, how far and where? For the time being, I'll move it after the "Grammar" section and before "Phrase list" in order to solve the immediate problem, but if you have a better idea, please let us know, so that we can discuss it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

See Indonesian phrasebook#Abbreviations. I've made it a first-order section of this phrasebook. It may be good to tweak it, because the infobox bleeds slightly into the next section. Do you think it shouldn't be a first-order section? What do you think about its placement now? Comparison. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the overlap! It was as easy as deleting an extra line break at the bottom of the infobox. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm proposing to change the pagebanner of Indonesian phrasebook to one of these choices below. These are all self-made, and I also take edit request and or new banner requests. I spent two days creating these banners, following the result of the search query suggested in Wikivoyage:Banner_Expedition#Image_sources . You can give constructive criticism to these works. Thank you. Bennylin (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure why you'd want to replace the current banner, which is lovely, but your unattractive suggested replacements are not the correct dimensions (7:1 width:height). It's a no from me, I'm afraid. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@ThunderingTyphoons!: Hi, I propose to change it because the current one is not related to the topic at all, it's neither Indonesian or related to the language. I have fixed the dimensions, and changed the second image, inspired from Malay phrasebook banner. Please inspect, and if you have any idea, please suggest. Thanks. Bennylin (talk) 22:09, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The current banner seems to be a crop of a modern Indonesian batik painting. Do you know the painting to be non-Indonesian? In any case, neither of your proposed alternate banners are nearly as striking. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since 2009 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Indonesian_Batik_Artwork.jpg Bennylin (talk) 09:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If my works are not of your liking, yet you can't give any objective criticism to improve them, other than "unattractive" and "not striking", then feel free to peruse more than 108 images in c:Category:Wikivoyage_banners_of_Indonesia. Any of them would make a good banner. Bennylin (talk) 11:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Aesthetics are not objective; we're just giving our opinions. The person who uploaded the source image obviously believed it was batik, as did the original artist. Now I have zero knowledge of batik, so can't say which of you is right, but suggest that a good replacement banner would depict some real batik artwork. I can give one objective criticism of File:Indonesian language.png: the text banner over the map will interfere with the article title. Your third suggestion is fine, but still less appealing to me than artwork.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 14:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I used to live in the Malaysian state of Terengganu, the second most famous for batik in Malaysia, I've visited the best-known batik factory outside of Kuala Terengganu and had the process shown and explained to me, and my mother had the best collection of handmade Southeast Asian cloth in the U.S., so I'm well aware of what batik is, but I also know there's a lot of newfangled art in Indonesia, and I don't think the link you posted proves that this is not Indonesian art. Why you'd ask people to be "objective", I can't imagine. People are not objective, pagebanners are for decoration as much as they're meant to be relevant, and objectivity is not part of the claims or aesthetics of this site. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the input, Thundering Typhoon, that's what I'm looking for. I have fixed option 1, showing no text. As for the choice of batik, personally I think it doesn't reflect the topic of the page (phrasebook, language), also to answer Ikan Kekek (how do you think a is painting is relevant to the topic of language?). Language is about the people, the speakers, the place where it's primarily spoken, or a visual text of the language (option 2). I was searching for hours for a best depiction of Indonesian people engaging in conversation, I will put the candidates below. Also, if you like batik that much, then I will also show some, from the gallery of Close-up photographs of batik. PS: these are just CSS crop, so not a real file with that dimension. I scale it in half (1050x150 px). I apologized if I ruffled you feathers, but as someone growing up with batik myself, and native speaker of the subject language, I also have opinions on what constitutes as a good banner, while there are literally tons of better alternatives. Bennylin (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, but none of these have the right dimensions to be pagebanners. If they were edited to be the right size and looked like they look on this page, I like 4 and 5 about equally and then 10 and 6. I don't think it's at all essential for this pagebanner to show batik. I understand your point of view, but I don't think a pagebanner has to show words, although all things being equal, that would be better. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Correct about the dimensions, that's on purpose, as I stated above the gallery, I cropped it half the correct dimension (1050x150 px), because I tried the full dimension (2100x300 px) in PC, and it turns out to be out of viewing area, for example:

I also like this image. If everyone agree this is a better substitute, then I will crop, edit, and upload it. Thanks for the input! Bennylin (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I think it's possible to do better than this, but I'd be OK with it. Some of the batik photos are more beautiful. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Among the batiks, I also like 5. So for now let's make both 5 and 10 as shortlist.

PS: Before this discussion started, I have asked in a Wikipedian group off-wiki about what image is best at portraying the concept of Indonesian language, and many of the selection above are their ideas (while the original globe pictures, 1 and 2 are mine). So I just sent the same group about this discussion that we're currently having, since they're also have a part in it. Please be aware if there are new WV editors coming to this discussion. Bennylin (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Of course everyone is welcome to comment, and it would be great if we had more Indonesian editors improving this site's coverage of Indonesian destinations. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

To answer Bennylin why batik was chosen as banner topic (this doesn't mean we absolutely must keep it that way if someone finds it very disturbing): for example city articles would be monotonous if their banners would consist exclusively of skylines, and we in many cases pick street views, attractions, details of attractions, events etc. to depict the city in the banner. Likewise phrasebooks can be represented by pieces of text from books, signs and so on, but also by landscapes or cultural heritage from a country where the language is spoken. Ypsilon (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A much better selection than before. #10 is my favourite of the non-batik ones, but if I had to choose between it and any of the batik ones, I'd still go for a batik. The one with the woman's hand in it (#6) is nice, but it would probably be covered over by the article name box. I also like #5 with the animals. BTW, #1 looks much better without the ghastly all caps text over it, although it's reminiscent of our default destination page banners, e.g. File:Mena-asia default banner.jpg.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree to #6 as the banner. For the hand to be displayed, the picture can be flipped horizontally, although I'm not sure if that's allowed. #10 does the justice for me the most, since it has the educational nuance of learning Bahasa Indonesia. I also want to suggests this one if it's appropriate File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-06.jpg. ibhi19 (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The mosque picture is very good, but I'd have to see it with the right dimensions to judge it as a pagebanner. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Here's 11a and 11b. Bennylin (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'll leave it to others to decide how representative the mosque is, but it's a good quality image and 11a is the better crop.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy with having a batik image for the banner, but as an alternative to batik that portrays Indonesian culture, I can suggest images of wayang kulit, or maybe gamelan. These are some of the things I will think of as typically Indonesian. The dog2 (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree that 11a would be the better crop. I'd like to see what it actually looks like as a banner across the top of a page before making any firm decisions on whether I like it best, though. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Ikan Kekek: here you go.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re The dog2: regarding wayang kulit or gamelan, I think it would be more appropriate for Javanese phrasebook. Just as I think images of Balinese temples are more suitable for Balinese phrasebook. Bennylin (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

#shortlist

I've made these 3 into shortlist. Maybe we can start to choose/consensus/vote/whatever method appropriate. Thanks for all who gave valuable inputs. Bennylin (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

• 
  File:WV banner Indonesian phrasebook - Batik.jpg Choice #5 above
• 
  File:WV banner Indonesian phrasebook - Library.jpg Choice #10 above
• 
  File:WV banner Indonesian phrasebook - Mosque.jpg Choice #11a above

Thank you, Bennylin, for substituting the mosque and people-in-a-room banners in place of the default banners on the Sundanese and Manado Malay phrasebooks. That leaves the batik banner from among these three, and since I don't think any of the others is clearly better than that one, anyway (the mosque one is probably about as good in its own way), I'd be happy to see the batik banner on this page. And it's definitely better than the existing banner, so if that's the result of these discussions, I think we should be happy, thank Bennylin and put any remaining hurt feelings behind us. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, no hard feelings :). I will leave the changing to you guys. Bennylin (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ThunderingTyphoons! and The dog2, are you OK with this batik banner for now? Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the banner is good for me. The dog2 (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's very nice.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Replaced accordingly. Thanks, everyone! Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

From the article:

But the rules of how to spell new loan words from English are still different, for example "televisi" (Indonesian) - "televisyen" (Malay), "polisi" (Indonesian) - "polis" (Malay), "universitas" (Indonesian) - "universiti" (Malay), etc.

I'm sure televisi and polisi come from Dutch televisie and politie. Universiteit is Dutch for university, so perhaps the Indonesian word is borrowed from Portuguese universidade or perhaps directly from Latin universitas, but why is there any reason to suggest that any of these are "new loan words" and definitely from English? I think we need to delete or suitably edit this sentence. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've expanded this section more. Bennylin (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_language

It is called Malaysian, not Malay, by its government. (commenting from mobile) Bennylin (talk) 00:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link. It's gone back and forth between Bahasa Melayu and Bahasa Malaysia, but we call it Malay on this site. If you'd like to argue to rename it Malaysian on this site, please start a thread at Talk:Malay phrasebook. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

In Singapore, the language is called Bahasa Melayu, and that term is also understood in Malaysia. In any case, "Malay" is the most common term used in English to refer to the language, so that's what we use here. The dog2 (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of which, I just created a redirect from Malaysian phrasebook to Malay phrasebook, since "Malaysian" is indeed the word most Indonesians use when speaking English. The dog2 (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• WV banner Indonesian phrasebook Batik art.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

It may be that User:Bennylin nominated this for deletion because he doesn't like the banner, but his argument that it's a copyrighted artwork is probably meritorious. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do you we want to save it from the axe by locally uploading it? --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 08:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't know. Do you think an image of a painting can be fair use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I won't pretend to know anything about fair use. Legally justified or not, the deletion nomination strikes me as a rather petty response to the above thread which didn't go user:Bennylin's way: "Oh they won't do what I want, so I'll force them to change the banner by having it deleted." Great collegiality.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Now it's a personal attack. Nice. A new level of low. I would much appreciate it if we can have a civil discussion and didn't resort to ad hominem. And you didn't comment a single thing on the painting in question was illegally uploaded as public domain, as if the buyer of said art was holding the copyright of the painting. Bennylin (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I said your argument is probably meritorious. That's a comment. Sorry you think my remark was an attack. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the indentation mistake. I'm referring to ThunderingTyphoons' calling my deletion nomination as petty response. Although I also thought about your comment, "it may be Bennylin", as if you haven't seen the nom page, but you pointing finger at me, while it's clear from the nom page I have left my signature there. Bennylin (talk) 17:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, I said it may be that you nominated it for deletion because you don't like it, and I then expressed an opinion about your argument. I didn't say it might or might not have been you who nominated it, and how could I have expressed an opinion about your argument without having read it? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An ad hominem is criticism directed at a person, rather than their arguments or actions. It's not an ad hominem to describe how your actions seemed to me. You could have said in the above discussion that the artwork was copyrighted, and thus explained that you were going to nominate it for deletion, but instead you didn't mention copyright at all, preferring to focus instead on our lack of objectivity. Then you made the nomination on Commons without telling us and before the banner discussion had concluded, leaving the bot to notify us that it was up for deletion. That behaviour to me came across as not collegial.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Agree with TT here. That's not consensus. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | en.wikipedia) 01:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

We resolved this disagreement, I think to everyone's satisfaction, with a much better pagebanner. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Swept in from the pub

Hi travellers, you're all invited for this discussion. Suggestion and ideas welcomed. Many thanks. Bennylin (talk) 22:09, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

It has 72 rotating banners 😂😂😂 Bennylin (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Bennylin: Gotta add more then, since there are new Indonesian city/region pages that have been created. Veracious (talk) 05:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is wrong on so many levels. Firstly, Z in Latin was never a dz sound and neither was Q in English a kw. And I have no idea why you included the ipa pronunciaiton for other languages too 76.157.162.44 21:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply